Category Archives: Guest Posts

GUEST POST: Crown Heights Through the Eyes of a Child

Sholomanarchy writes:

I recall Yud Shevat 5753, during the height of the "balcony period". I was then a young boy in Cheder, and the messianic fervor had seized the Lubavitcher cult in its death grip. Walking to Oholei Torah that morning, I knew – WE knew – that today was going to be the day when the Rebbe finally reveals himself as Moshiach. I overheard Chaim Shaul Bruk (sp? Brook? Brooke? Burekeh? Burka? I don’t really give a damn, he was a kugel-thrower), the fat one, mention that people were waiting at the airport in Israel with a white donkey.

It wasn’t a hope, it wasn’t a desire. It was a well-known fact to us children, the תנוקות של בית רבן. That was all I could think about, as we listened to Rabbi Zeligson drone on out of the Ma’amor Bosi Legani during the Pre-Shachris Chasidus Shiur that was part of the holiday program. That’s what Itche Zalmanov and I spoke about during recess, instead of playing our usual 6th grade fantasyland games of "witchie" or "stupid robbers". When school let out early for the day, I ran the block and a half to 770 and squeezed my way through the masses of black Kapotes and blazers, hoping to get a good spot from which to view the long-awaited Hisgalus.

"Mincha now! Mincha now!" All over the neighborhood, Moshiach beepers go off; People run up Kingston towards Eastern Parkway. I pray with deep concentration, hoping that the Rebbe is watching me. Teka Beshoifar Godol Lecheiruseinu – it’s not just words, I can feel it; it’s about to happen. Perhaps if he notices how hard I’m trying to bring the redemption, he’ll help me out when he’s the king; I hope I get a candy-tree in my front yard.

The final Kaddish is said, the last "Amen" drowned out by the ocean of faithful admiration. Thousands of voices rise in song to praise their king and wish him eternal life. He makes a barely perceptible gesture with his left hand, the throngs react as if by instinct, and the singing becomes even more fervent. Faster and faster the mantra is repeated, the words grating against each other as thousands of Chasidim jump up and down on their toes, caught up in the spiritual ecstasy of the moment.

It is so close, so imminent. Today is the fifty-second anniversary of his becoming our leader. The Rebbe himself, the head of the children of Israel, had promised that we were the generation of redemption. He has told us that Moshiach is already here, that we just have to open our eyes.

My eyes are opened. I can see it, can envision it. Any moment now, the Rebbe will stand up. He will swing his arms in his signature gesture. Not the left-handed tremor, not a fist banging on his lectern, not even a one-armed swing; but a full-fledged two-armed swing that will bring the walls of Golus crashing down. He will regain his voice, and the first words out of his mouth will be a resounding הגיע זמן גאולתכם – the time for your redemption has arrived!

The Rebbe makes a gesture to his lackeys, and they swing the curtains shut on the farcical ceremony. Today was not the long-awaited redemption; it was merely another instance of mindless adoration by the sheeple. Tomorrow will be the same – the curtains will open, the curtains will shut, and the masses will have gotten another fix of opiates.



Filed under Chabad History, Chabad Theology, Guest Posts

GUEST POST: Rabbinic Reasoning and Bugs In Vegetables – “It’s all nonsense based on ignorance NOT Torah NOT halacha”

By JewishWhistleBlower

Shmarya, I noticed your post and the discussion on Hirhurim re: the

article by Bleich and have not had a chance to comment. Feel free

to do some research and correct/utilize my commentary below, I

unlike others, do not hold myself out to be an expert in Halacha or

Science, but I do have an opinion and very often the facts. I also

have above average ability to recognize those who do hold

themselves out to be experts, when in fact they should not,

particularly when their “facts” are wrong. I humbly believe that to

be the case here.

This is very rough and done very quickly copying and pasting some

materials to assist me. I have also emailed this to Rabbi Student …

[Shmarya wrote:]

The next day, Rabbi Student posted on the

current controversy over bugs and pre-

packaged romaine lettuce. He noted that

Rabbi J. David Bleich has pointed out that

the a Talmudic passage indicates shepherds

used to have much better eyesight than we

now have.

The fact is, and I suggest you speak to an expert on eyes, Bleich

is quoting a passage concerning shepherds being able to see further

than we can today even with glasses. That is distance vision.

Clearly neither Bleich nor Student have any idea about what they

are talking about. Clearly the editors who reviewed Bleich’s

article also need a refresher course in this area of optometry.

This is an example of a poor understanding of science and in

particular eyesight. I am shocked that no one else has pointed to

the blatant error here. Clearly, bloggers along with the rest of

the Torah world have a shockingly poor education, particularly when

it comes to science.

The ability to see things in the distance is inverse to the ability

to see things close-up. When one has better distance vision they

have poorer vision close-up, when one has better vision close-up,

they have poorer distance vision. These are two different types of

defects in the lens of the human eye. The eyeball is either too

long or too narrow from front to back. It simply can’t be both.

Put simply, if these shepherds could see things in the distance

better than we can today, they would have poorer close-up vision

then we have today. So actually, many of the bugs we see with our

unassisted eyes today would have not been seen by these shepherds

and certainly they could not have seen whan we see with light boxes

and magnification devices.

In other words, this whole area of bug kashrut is all absolute and

total nonsense based of mistaken understanding of sight. This is a

true example of utter ignorance becoming “halachic science” and

mistaken psak becoming the norm in the kashrut industry.

1) Myopia/Near-sightedness

You can only see objects that are close and things far away appear

blurry. This is due to the shape of the eyeball and how far an

image has to travel to be focused on your retina.

Eyeball is too LONG from front to back and the image is focused in

front of your retina.

2) Far-sighted

You can’t see near objects.

Your eyeball is too NARROW from front to back and the image is

focused farther back on your retina than normal.

A nearsighted eye can only focus on close objects; nearsightedness

can be corrected by concave spherical lenses, essentially bringing

the images of far objects closer. A farsighted eye can only focus

on far objects; farsightedness can be corrected by convex spherical

lenses, essentially pushing the images of near objects away.

Clearly, these shepherds had eyeballs that were too narrow front to

back. Their distance vision was terrific, but certainly their

ability to focus on close objects would have been terrible NOT


So if they had better distance vision than we have today, we would

have better vision with regard to close objects.

So really, we don’t need light boxes, magnification devices or

mashgiach t’midis for vegtables and fruits. It’s all nonsense based

on ignorance NOT Torah NOT halacha.


Filed under Blogs, Guest Posts, Haredim, Kosher Business?, Modern Orthodoxy

GUEST POST: The Sad Situation Of The Jewish People

By Ze’ev Atlas

How sad is the situation of the Jewish people! The right wing secularists believe that they could resolve all the problems with military and political force, despite the clear evidence to the contrary from the last war. Especially after the military and political defeat in battle, the immediate political strengthening of their immediate enemy, the appearance of Iran as a local super-power and the clear political power of the Muslim countries block. The left wing secularists believe that they may achieve peace with the Arabs despite the clear evidence to the contrary after the collapse of the Oslo experiment. The Religious Zionists believe that the settlements and the territories are the most important thing and maintaining them is an achievable goal despite, well, the clear evidence to the contrary after even the right wing Israeli government threw them out of some of the settlements and is planning to continue doing the same. And with the political power of the Muslim countries block, this goal is not achievable at all. The Haredi world, in its struggle to keep the principles of Judaism intact against any possibility of heresy, forbid any attempt to seek the truth as if the Satan himself is standing behind the truth. And the Moshiach Freaks (pun intended) in Lubavitch, they just worship a dead man instead of G-od and explain to anyone who listens that the man is still alive despite, well, well, the clear evidence to the contrary that the man is indeed dead and is buried in the ground.

And what about making peace with G-od, trusting in him and sticking with his seal, the Truth? Whoever does it must be, according to all the above factions, a heretic, primitive who believe in superstition and has lost any touch with reality.

Cross posted at Ze’ev Atlas’ new blog.

1 Comment

Filed under Blogs, Guest Posts, Jewish Leadership

GUEST POST: THESE ARE NOT THE BUILDERS BUT THE DESTROYERS (Talmud Yerushalmi Hagiga 76c) – An open response to the misuse of miracles in support of a Young Earth

By Shmuel Bergenfeld

Recently, there has been an argument presented by quite a few respected rabbis and their assistants in defense of the alleged Torah viewpoint of a <6000 year old universe. This argument, in a nutshell, states that all miracles, especially the Creation and the Flood, were irrational and beyond any human and scientific comprehension, and so they invalidate any scientific method of dating the age of the earth. Whether it be geological, radiocarbon, or starlight, each method is an illogical byproduct of the great miracles described in the Torah. Any attempt to use them as indicators of the world’s age, according to this claim, is arrogant “extrapolation” by rabid atheistic scientists, and is even “unscientific.”

Those well meaning Orthodox Jews, in making this claim, essentially have three goals:

A) To make a claim which is beyond any rational discussion, and is thereby irrefutable and even invincible, because what good is it to abide by my hashkafa if there are other valid hashkafas?

B) To show that one can fully disqualify valid scientific methods as illegitimate extrapolation and still be considered loyal to “real science” (whatever that means)

C) To affirm the existence of an Omnipresent Creator who can disrupt all of nature at His will, and so the more scientific evidence I snub, the more yiras shomayim I have.

I will now demonstrate that the aforementioned argument accomplishes NONE of those goals. Even worse, the argument completely undermines those goals. Instead of defending yiddishkeit from kefira, its claimants INADVERTENTLY SUPPORT KEFIRA AND PLAY RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF ATHEISTS!

Claim A: Miracles are beyond rational discussion. Technically speaking, I cannot use science to argue against this claim. But I can use the same Torah that they derive this proof from as evidence that this “proof” is completely bogus and taken out of context.

Ostensibly, the source that the Flood disrupted nature is in Rosh Hashanah 11b-12a, which states that Hashem changed Maaseh Bereishis in response to a far away astronomical event. This proves, they claim, that such basic phenomenon as the Earth’s axis tilt was a result of the Flood, as is a whole slew of other phenomenon which this argument arbitrarily claims.

But what exactly was this disruption of nature? That very sugya, according to Rashi, states that all of the constellations appeared as they do today in their proper seasons, except that the Big Dipper appeared a bit too early, and so Hashem took away two stars from it and caused the Mabul. Well, how did the constellations appear as they did if the Earth’s axis didn’t tilt?

In fact, Tosafos even corrects an errant text that Rashi used BY CLAIMING THAT CURRENT ASTRONOMY CONTRADICTS THAT TEXT!!! So if anything, the Talmud verifies the fact that much of nature was the same before the flood as after. There is no license to start wildly stuffing all sort of scientific phenomenon into the realm of after-Flood effects.

And about miracles. Allegedly, miracles and their effects completely disrupt nature. Unfortunately for that claim, the texts indicate the exact opposite – that as soon as the miracle is over, everything goes back to normal!

For example, after the Flood subsided, Noach had to wait some time for the Earth to dry up. Certainly something which you would expect from perfectly ordinary water! In what way was this “irrational”?

Another example: After the Jews collected the Manna, did the leftover manna vanish in a fiery chariot? No – it simply melted like any other similar substance would and was drunk by the deer in the pasture. Once the miracle, no matter how great, is over, any effects revert completely back to normal.

And speaking about the mesora, the miracles and “science” (for lack of a better word) of the Torah are completely above contemporary science, not in place of it. Why has no one has raised any objection to the Periodic Table of Elements from the four elements (earth air fire water) of maaseh bereishis as described by the Rambam Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah (although with today’s klowns, you can never be sureL) See the Be’er HaGolah, Sixth Gate for an elaboration of this concept.

Come on, you guys! Do you really think that every Orthodox Jew who believes in miracles must subscribe to this pseudo-science babble? You are insulting your own intelligence, not that of the hundreds of Orthodox Jewish scientists who belief in both miracles AND an Old Earth.

I just read the book One People Two Worlds, which is a debate between an Orthodox (Yosef Reinman) and Reform rabbi (Ammiel Hirsch). As you would expect, every Talmudic source which Hirsch brings as “proof” of his position is shown by Reinman to be completely taken out of context.

Unfortunately, those on the opposite extreme do the exact same crime to the Talmud by distorting the very same mesora which they claim to be defending. If understanding statements in context is what differentiates the Orthodox from the Reform, according to Reinman, then I can’t help but wonder if the Young Earth creationists are somewhat closer to Reform Judaism than they are to Orthodox.

Claim B. Evolution is “extrapolation”. My dear friends, ALL of science is extrapolation. We see, with a telescope, stars trillions of miles away, and atoms, with a microscope, trillions of times smaller than ourselves. In fact, we are quite sure of many things such as black holes and certain subatomic particles which no one has actually seen but rather detected. And as relativity has shown, time is just another coordinate. From a scientific point of view, a billion years ago is almost as visible as a billion miles away.

To take the human senses as a benchmark for extrapolation shows not only an anti-scientific attitude but sheer insanity. Haven’t you ever seen a mirage or an illusion which you know does not exist? Tell me then, what is more reliable, human “testimony” or science?

Claim C. Invalidating scientific dating affirms belief in a Creator. This is the most dangerous and false claim, and even does the opposite, chas vesholom.

Why? Because each time a new method indicates an old age for the earth, one simply claims that the Creator interfered with that method. Is there a tree with more than 6000 rings? Hashem made it that way. Radiocarbon decay indicating billions of years old? No problem – Hashem changed the decay rate. Starlight billions of light years away? The heck with it – Hashem made those light rays on there own.

Gee wiz! These pathetic scientists are so important that G-D HIMSELF HAS TO INTERFERE WITH THEIR CALCULATIONS! Growing up in yeshiva, I always thought that explaining Hashem’s ways was the job of kabbalists and great rabbis. But no! Apparently, these heretical scientists see more of G-d’s handiwork than all of the gedolim combined!!!

Do we have a mesora for our pseudo-scientific explanations of the Flood and Creation? Of course not, but who cares?! Only Slifkin is a koifer for not following the “mesora” (whatever that means), but us ??!! Naaaa.

So in a sense, you are not helping Hashem, but reducing Him, keveyachol, to your PlayDough, to be retroactively interpreted at each whim of the scientists. This god who you are interpreting is not the real G-d, but a figment of your imagination. You demonstrate loud and clear, though inadvertently, that it is not G-d who controls you, but you who controls G-d, chas vesholom.

Indeed, the Talmud’s timeless statements ring true today as they did then – these are not the builders, but the destroyers.

Sincerely yours,

Shmuel Bergenfeld


Filed under Guest Posts, Torah and Science

GUEST POST: Daas Torah Does Not Work

Shmuel has submitted the following guest post detailing the failures of Daas Torah, the haredi ideology that claims near-infallibility for haredi sages:

1. The Destruction of Jerusalem

Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai, who might have asked for Jerusalem and its Beit Hamikdash, was considered by the rabbis in the Talmud in Gittin as having been inspired by Heaven not to ask for the right things, and they apply the pasuk from Isaiah that G-d turns aside the wise men from their wisdom. Wasn’t he the very embodiment of daas Torah in his generation? Was he mistaken?

2. The Maimonidean controversy.

 Weren’t the French/German rabbis daas Torah? Today’s Charedim would say so. Yet they burnt his books and excommunicated Rambam. It wasn’t long thereafter that the Talmud was burnt. Many thought it was Divine punishment for the ban and burning. Wasn’t Sefer Shaarey Tshuvah written as a posthumous apology of a sort? And isn’t Rambam indisputably one of the greatest rabbis and halachists and philosophers ever? Of course he is. Wasn’t he invited back to the fold? Yes. Right you can’t be a Rosh Yeshiva today unless you can “farenfer” a shvere Rambam? Right.

 Now, if a daas Torah Jew of today were to be transported back to France of the 12/13th centuries, and was confronted with the leading rabbis of the day about to burn Rambam’s books, knowing what he knows NOW, what should he do? Isn’t it pretty plainly evident that daas Torah back then was dead wrong?

3. Chasidim and Misnagdim

How about the Vilna Gaon’s ban on the Chasidim? I know they changed a bit, and don’t stand on their heads as often as they did, but he still banned them and refused to meet them. Now, we all know that (as quoted in the name of Rav Moshe Feinstein) Chasidm have served to prop up and maintain Judaism over the years. Love them or not, there’s no denying the simple truth that they are needed and serve the Jewish people. We’d all be the poorer if they weren’t on the scene. So what shall I do now, seeing that daas Torah, none other than the Vilna Gaon himself, banned a group that 200 years later has added immeasurably to the growth and vitality of Klal Yisroel? Was he mistaken?

4. Shabtai Tzvi

Didn’t many rabbis of his day think he was the Messiah? Were they not daas Torah? Weren’t they mistaken? Most of the Jewish world thought he was Moshiach. Why did they think that? Weren’t they told so by their rabbis?

5. Jewish education for Jewish women

There was enormous controversy about this at the outset, and there were plenty of rabbis who opposed chinuch for Jewish girls. Sara Schnerir just kept fighting until she won. Now, Jewish education for girls is so matter of course that if a rabbi can’t get a job teaching boys, he gets a job teaching girls. And no one bats an eyelash. Yet they did @130 years ago. Why? Knowing what we know now, were they mistaken?

6. The Mussar movement

I’m no expert, but it’s well known that there were indeed great rabbis who opposed the new movement, thinking it was unnecessary, would take boys away from Talmud study. Look who won the day. There are lots oif “mussar yeshivas  today and they’re thriving. Were the opponents wrong in their assessment?

7. The Brisker derech in learning

Here, too, there was indeed opposition to Reb Chaim’s new methods. One rabbi criticized it vehemently as “chemistry” and not the mesorah of how Moshe Rabbeinu received and transmitted Torah. Today, learning in Brisk is what you need to do if you want to marry a wealthy girl. And who doesn’t want that?

8. The Agudah’s opposition to Zionism

a.There’s no denying this: we all know the Agudah effectively went 180 degrees from its original opposition. Today it sits in the Knesset and takes Zionist money. So cooprating with the Zionists is ok after all, especially when G-d seems to allow them to win? Were they mistaken originally?

b. Could the original Agudistim have foreseen a day when there would be tens of thousands of Jewish men learning Torah full-time in Israel? I guess not, or else they would have favored such a thing. Yet they opposed the creation of the state. With all its problems–and there are problems—you have more Torah being learned there than anywhere else in the world, and more than at any time since churban Bayit Sheni. Where was there vision?

c. The Hebrew language fight: it was bitter, but today there isn’t a yeshiva bachur in Israel who doesn’t speak Hebrew, and he can’t imagine what the fuss was all about. And neither can I. Now that we see that everyone frum in Israel speaks Hebrew (except for the linguistically challenged American yeshiva guys), who had the vision? Who was mistaken?

d. After 58 years, 4 victorious wars, aliyah of millions, tens of thousands learning Torah, an unbelievable buildup of Jewish life after 2000 years of dormancy in Israel, ongoing successful fighting against terrorism, and (for whatever the following is worth)a sea change in the attitude of nothing less than the Catholic Church (which considers itself the inheritor of the mantle of “Israel”) in its relations to the Jews and Israel, isn’t it fair to say that the creation of the State of Israel was G-d’s will after all? Were the charedi opponents then wrong?

9. America and Jewish immigration

a. We all know that European rabbis urged their townfolk and congregants not to leave for the treife medinah of America. Of course there was assimilation here, but it existed in Europe as well. Good thing my grandparents ignored those rabbis, or I wouldn’t be here today. Alive, that is. And neither would you. Where was the vision? Were they wrong? We have the privilege of debating it because our ancestors ignored rabbinical advice.

b. Rabbi Aaron Kotler had a vision of bringing back Torah lishma Torah study to the treife medinah of America. He succeeded. Is it fair to say that only he had vision, but the rest of his colleagues did not?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


Filed under Guest Posts, Haredim

Guest Post: Muslim Gang Tortures and Murders French Jew, US Media Silent


"They lynched him alive, they burnt him, they cut him simply because he was Jewish,” Ilan Halimi’s mother told French Television. (Photo:EJP)

The following article by Dr. Jerome Soller, Ph.D., is the third in a series of guest posts. If you want to guest post, please send me an email.

Muslim Gang Tortures and Murders French Jew, US Media Silent
By Jerome Soller, Ph.D.

I appreciate the opportunity to post this guest article in, which is providing a great resource for differing viewpoints in the Jewish community.  Last week, I heard about this tragedy, which was getting no exposure in the US Jewish or mainstream press.  This event impacts Jews everywhere, whether they are Chassidim, Haredi, orthodox, conservative, reform, reconstructionist, or secular. Throughout this article, I include references to reports from other sources (as I do not live in France).  The primary reason I am writing this article is the lack of US media coverage.  In the future, this article may be supplemented by a first-hand account of a friend, whose Jewish relative was murdered in France ten years ago.

In January, a pretty woman (whose friends were gang members) came into the shop of Ilan Halimi (a 23-year old French Jewish mobile telephone salesman).  They spoke several times on the phone, and then arranged a date.  On January 20, 2006, Ilan went to meet her and was kidnapped by a Muslim  gang in Paris (called the "Barbarians").  Four of six of the gang’s previous kidnapping targets were Jewish.  After the kidnapping, Ilan’s family received over 650 phone calls, Internet messages, and other forms of contact during a  three week period from the gang, while the family was cooperating with the French police [4].   ”When we said we didn’t have 500,000 euros to give them they answered we should go to the synagogue and get it,” Rafi (Ilian’s uncle) stressed. “They also recited verses from the Koran. We didn’t know what they were saying but the police told us. [6]" During his captivity, Ilan had his head covered, was starved,  stripped naked, cut, burned, and tortured in other ways. According to a poster on another web site, "they had castrated him, cut off his fingers, and gouged out his eyes. [10]" People in the neighboring apartments were aware of the hostage, but did nothing.  When the family could not reach the gang’s financial demands, the gang left Ilan to die.  He was rescued and died in the ambulance on his way to the hospital.  The French police arrested fifteen suspects.

At that point, the French police and media downplayed the incident as an isolated incident involving "disadvantaged" immigrant youths and did not mention the victim was Jewish.  The mainstream media and French police refused to give this much publicity or even consider that it might be a hate crime, as the perpetrators were Muslim and the victim a Jewish man.  After all, such publicity might offend the Muslim community, which was already offended by cartoons.  The family of the victim brought attention to the situation.  On February 16, the Paris public prosecutor, Jean-Claude Marin, said that “no element of the current investigation could link this murder to anti-Semitic declaration or action.[6]” If a black man was lynched by thirteen white men wearing sheets and screaming racist slogans while they burned a cross in his lawn, a reasonable person would at least consider the possibility of a racially motivated hate crime.  "They lynched him alive, they burnt him, they cut him simply because he was Jewish,” Ruth Halimi said on French television.  1,200 Jews from all sections of the French Jewish community (e.g., Chabad, secular, etc.) marched in Paris to ask for truth and action from French government officials.

Due to pressure, the French (who I believe are basically good people) are now considering the possibility of it being an anti-semitically motivated murder.  As the investigation has progressed, pro-Palestinian and Islamist documents were found in the homes of many of the perpetrators.   French Justice Minister Pascal Clement said one of the suspects had made it clear he attacked Ilan Halimi "because he was Jewish, and Jews are rich" [9]. French interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy told the French parliament, "The truth is that these hoodlums first of all acted for villainous and sordid reasons – money – but they had the belief, and I quote, ’that Jews have money’ and that even if those they kidnapped did not, the community would rally round”, citing a statement by one of the kidnappers [8].  "We fear that the fact that Ilan was Jewish aggravated his case and caused his kidnappers to behave as Islamists. Why did the kidnappers, once they discovered that Ilan’s family was not wealthy, as they had thought, not let him go and instead tortured him to death?," asked Sammy Ghozlan, head of the French Anti-Semitism Vigilance Bureau [6]. "According to the prosecutor, Halimi was tortured in scenes reminiscent of the abuse of prisoners at Baghdad’s notorious Abu Ghraib jail. [5]"

Are the anti-semitic stereotypes and attitudes that drove this hate crime any suprise?  Much of the Islamist documents in the suspects’ homes likely portrayed Jews as rich and evil.  Some French Muslim comedians portray the Jews as evil and the cause of the slave trade. Articles in the British Guardian [2] and French Liberation magazine suggest that the suspects were inspired by events in Iraq (blamed on the Jews) and films about such events.  For example,  the recent Turkish movie "Valley of the Wolves Iraq" [1][3] is giving the Jewish blood libel mainstream credibility, while it breaks Turkish box office records and will open in the United States, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Britain, Denmark, Russia, Egypt, Syria, Australia, and other places in the world where Jews serve as convenient scapegoats.  Its plot involves a Jewish-American doctor (played by an American actor – Gary Busey) removing the organs of wedding party attendees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq for delivery to rich people in the West.   I thought that the only people that typically killed Arab wedding party attendees were "Palestinian" terrorists!?  A friend of mine (Dan Black) suggested the Turks make another movie (called "Palestine: The New Protocols") about the rescue of a "Palestinian" infant from Jews, led by the chief Israeli rabbi played by Gary Busey, before Passover.  I shouldn’t write this in sarcasm, as it might happen (all in the name of multiculturalism and political correctness).  The increase in antisemitism also results from the fact that the French and other communities refuse to acknowledge the existence of anti-semitism and hate crimes committed by Muslims against Jews (or have any sensitivity to their causes), except under extreme circumstances.

When I heard about this tragedy, I was shocked that there was little coverage in the US.  While US news sources had countless articles about cartoons (without showing such mild cartoons for fear of retaliation) and "peaceful" "Palestinian" protests initiated by Hamas, no links to the murder of a Jew existed on any of their main US web pages.  After all, Hamas should be associated with "peace", as they only want to destroy Israel and Jews worldwide.  I guess it is major news that Palestinians had a protest, without anyone being hurt.

I hope that this article creates an awareness of these events, when mainstream US media coverage is lacking. I would also hope that there would be a sense of Jewish outrage over the events in France (and the initial hesitancy to seek the truth), the Turkish blood libel film and similar antisemitic literature (which provides a pretense for future violence against Jews), and the tendency of the media to selectively cover and/or sugarcoat events.  I am afraid that the current lack of a Jewish response emboldens enemies of the Jewish people.  Where are the ADL and other Jewish groups? If not now, when?


1. Associated Press, CNN, Turkish movie depicts Americans as savages, February, 2006,

2. Jason Burke, Guardian Unlimited, Torturer’s Iraq Links, February, 2006,

3. European Jewish Press, German political and Jewish leaders condemn Turkish Iraq movie, February, 2006,

4. Yossi Lempkowicz and David Dahan, European Jewish Press, Halimi’s mother blames police, February, 2006,

5. Yossi Lempkowicz and Shirli Sitbon, European Jewish Press, Anti-Semitism blamed for Paris murder, February, 2006,

6. Yossi Lempkowicz and Shirli Sitbon, Dispute around motivation for murder in Paris, European Jewish Press, February, 2006,

7. Reuters, CNN, France: Anti-Semitic link in death, February, 2006,

8. Reuters, ABS-CBN, France sees racist motive in brutal torture death, February, 2006,

9. Shirli Sitbon, French authorities : anti-Semitism may have played a role in Halimi’s murder, European Jewish Press,

10. Hannah Semesh, Free Republic, Paris: Gang suspected of killing Jew nabbed (Muslim gang not motivated by anti-Semitism say police)


Filed under Crime, Guest Posts

Guest Post: Kopul Rosen & The Rebbe – Myth Refuted

Rabbi Jeremy Rosen has sent in the following article about his late father, Kopul Rosen’s, z’l, relationship with the Rebbe. The comments in square brackets [ ] are Rabbi Rosen’s corrections to Rabbi Tuvia Bolton’s article as published by Chabad in Israel. They have been indented for clarity and readability.

My comments? Another Chabad myth destroyed:

Chabad Fantasy
By Rabbi Jeremy Rosen

The Lubavitcher Rebbe was undeniably a great man and arguably the greatest Jew of his generation. Many of his followers have done outstanding work around the globe. But sadly as with every large organisation they have their crooks, their swindlers and their liars. Amongst their failings is an exaggerated tendency to maximise miracles the Rebbe performed (while ignoring his limitations) and frankly lying to suit their own propaganda.

For many years there has been a story circulating that my father who died in 1962 was promised he would be cured by the Rebbe provided he did not tell anyone. But he did and that’s why he died. These stories caused my late mother as great deal of distress and at one stage she actually planned to take legal action. I have just had it brought to my attention that this dishonest story is still being disseminated. You can find a copy of this Chillul HaShem here  HYPERLINK "; .

The facts of the situation are that in the autumn of 1961 my late father (spelled Kopul) was diagnosed with a particularly virulent form of Lukaemia and he was being kept alive by regular blood transfusions. The Doctors described his condition as terminal. Initially he kept on repeating that he was in the hands of God, not fallible human doctors, but as he deteriorated his initial optimism began to wane.  An old friend Rabbi Laizer Spector wnt with him to visit the Lubavitcher Rebbe in New York. (My uncle – who had been going regularly to see the Rebbe before these events – had gone before my father.) My father was tremendously impressed by the Rebbe who encouraged him to devote his remaining time to preparing himself to meet his Maker. He suggested my father grow his beard full, wear a gartel when he prayed and study the Tanya daily. The visit certainly gave my father a lot of spiritual comfort. When he returned he wrote many letters to friends and pupils telling them that he was nearing his end but facing it with confidence. Things deteriorated of course and in the winter he went to New York again for a final visit to the Rebbe. He kept very detailed notes of both visits so we have written evidence apart from his own memory.

The Rebbe reassured him that he would live to dance at his daughter’s wedding (she was two at the time). One can argue whether this was honest or not. Let us assume he was just trying to give him courage or speaking mystically. But medically there was no chance of recovery. He died less than two months later.

Although I have never joined Chabad, when I was a rabbi in Glasgow I arranged for Chaim Jacobs to come as the Chabad emissary and indeed he was employed by my Synagogue, Giffnock, until he could get on to his own two feet. The Rebbe blessed my first marriage and was instrumental in my returning to Carmel as Headmaster. I made several trips to New York to see the Rebbe and to get Chabad teachers to come to Carmel . But no, I am a fellow traveller rather than a believer.

All this is by way of introduction. Here is the body of this regurgitated myth:

‘The scene is London 1963.

[My father died in 1962.]

Three religious bearded Jews are sitting around a table and one, a noted Rabbi and community leader by the name of Rabbi Koppel (sic) Rosen was weeping. Usually he was known almost as well for his disdain toward the Chabad Chassidim

[Strange. When I was in Beer Yaakov yeshiva in 1957 he came to visit and together we went to Kfar Chabad to meet some friends of his. He was responsible for getting Lord Wolfson to fund the building of Lubavitch House in Stamford Hill in the 1950’s and he was a very old friend of Reb Laizer Spector, ZL one of the main early supporters of Chabad in London who actually went with him to the Rebbe the first time. My father was in contact with the Rebbe long before, as letters exchanged between them in the fifties on various issues attest. Incidentally although my late father was sent to Mir Yeshivah and became a great admirer of Rav Yerucham Levovitz ZL after whom I am named and the Mussar movement, he was actually born into a family of Radomsker Chassidim and the Chasidic atmosphere was a far more formative aspect of home life than the Lithuanian.]

as he was for his erudition.

[Whose erudition? His own? He lived for Torah.]

Whenever there was an opportunity to belittle or even vilify Chabad he took it.

[Really? I’d like to hear one person say he ever heard my father belittle Chabad.]

But now it seems that things had changed.

Several weeks later Rabbi Rosen was standing before the Rebbe. It had all come about so suddenly, he had always shuddered in rupulsion (sic) at the name Chabad

[Oh no not that lie again!]

and now it was so obvious that the Rebbe was unequaled in holiness and knowledge that he was actually shaking with excitement.  But the Rebbe wasn’t enthusiastic about his idea of becoming a Chassid. "Chassid?" he answered, "I am willing to accept you as a partner.  But not a Chassid."

[My father kept very detailed notes of his meeting and only the first part of this about being a partner can be found amongst them.]

Rabbi Rosen stayed for over a week in Brooklyn

[He has got the two visits confused and time scales wrong]

and every day he felt better and better, in some ways better than ever before in his life.  For the first time the hatred

[Hatred? What hatred? Of whom? My father never bore grudges nor hated anyone. Chabad? Them why had he been helping them for so long?]

he had always carried in his heart was gone. That Shabbat he attended the ‘Farbrengen’ (gathering) of the Rebbe. Rabbi Rosen was elated.  After the Farbringen he told everyone  he met of the amazing miracle that was happening to him;. how just reading the Tanya and seeing the Rebbe completely cured him of the worst disease and made him young again.

[There was no cure, no remission. But I agree he did feel tremendous spiritual elation from being with the Rebbe.]

When the Shabbat was over he called home and told his wife to advertise the miracle until everyone knew.

[Rubbish, confirmed by my mother.]

Rabbi Rosen never felt better in his life.

[He was on constant blood transfusions!]

He exclaimed that he was healthy and he felt it would last for ever. "I’ll begin by telling everyone about my miraculous recovery!" He exclaimed enthusiastically.

[His letters, notes and conversations say nothing about this at all.]

But the  Rebbe emphatically stopped him. "No! You must tell no one!

[Complete piffle.]

But it was too late.  Rabbi Rosin (sic) had already advertised

[Strange that none of his family knew about this myth.]

After a few months he contracted a cold which developed complications

[He had leukaemia!]

and, as the Rebbe forsaw (sic), he passed away.

Today, said the Rebbe, we should advertise to ALL the world that the time for Moshiach is here!  Soon all the sick will be permanently healed, war and hatred will cease to exist and eventually even the dead will rise!  It depends on us to do all we can to bring….Moshiach now!!!’

Boobah Maisehs and lies will not bring the Moshiach NOW!!

Frankly if he/they can invent this, then every story they tell becomes suspect. I just hope someone of honesty and truth in Chabad sees this and puts an end to it for the sake of their good name.

UPDATE #1, 2-21-06: Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky sent in scans of the Rabbi Kopul Rosen story as originally published by Lubavitch in England. The story is told by Rabbi Rosen’s wife, Bella. As is easily seen, the story has little in common with the myth later created and circulated by Chabad.

Please click on each image below for an enlargement. All are taken from "Challenge: An Encounter with Lubavitch Chabad," published by the Lubavitch Foundation of Great Britain, 1970.




UPDATE #2, 2-24-06: Rabbi Bolton has "corrected" his version of the story – by lying even more. As I noted in a new post above:

The publication of Rabbi Jeremy Rosen’s expose´of
Chabad’s twisting and exaggeration of his father’s story has drawn a
lot of attention inside Chabad. And the author of Chabad’s most
deceitful version, Rabbi Tuvia Bolton of Kfar Chabad, Israel, has taken
to promising at least some readers that he would correct and update his
version. One such reader emailed me with a link to Rabbi Bolton’s "correction,"
which turns out to be an edited version of the story that replaces
Rabbi Kopul Rosen’s name with the anonymous "Rabbi J.," and that keeps
many of the lies of the original version intact. And, Rabbi Bolton
nowhere mentions his errors or publicly apologizes for lying about
Rabbi Rosen’s relationship with the Rebbe, and his passing.

How can anyone trust anything Chabad publishes or says when its rabbis lie like this?

[Here’s a PDF of Rabbi Bolton’s "corrected" version: Download tuvia_bolton.pdf]

UPDATE #3, 2-24-06: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen writes in this week’s Something Jewish:

I find it fascinating that the Gospel of Mark in the
New Testament contains a similar story of a man being warned not to
reveal a miraculous healing, but publicizing it anyway. It seems that
it’s not just the Second Coming that some people in Chabad are
borrowing from Christianity! If people can invent nonsense like this to
bolster their belief systems, then every story they tell becomes
suspect. Myths and lies certainly won’t help bring ‘Moshiach Now’!

was my mother’s Yahrzeit this week. Out of respect for her memory, let
alone my father’s, zl, I hope someone in Chabad has the integrity and
authority to put an end to this for the sake of its own good name.

Kopul Rosen 2, 3 & 4.


Filed under Chabad History, Guest Posts